Net Metering Explained: How It Works and Which States Have the Best Policies

California's NEM 3.0 killed full retail net metering in April 2023, cutting solar payback rates by 75%. Now other states are following suit. Here's how net metering actually works, which states still pay fairly, and why the next 18 months will reshape solar economics nationwide.

By Dana Mercer  ·  March 2026  ·  10 min read
75% Average reduction in solar credits under California's NEM 3.0 vs NEM 2.0 CPUC data, 2023-2026
38 States with mandatory net metering policies—but only 12 pay full retail rates DSIRE database, 2026

Let me explain net metering in 30 seconds: Your solar panels produce power. When they make more than you use, the excess flows to the grid. Your utility credits you for that power. When you need electricity at night, you draw from the grid using those credits. Simple, right?

Not anymore. California's NEM 3.0 turned this simple exchange into a complex calculation that can make or break your solar investment. And now Arizona, Nevada, and North Carolina are implementing similar changes. If you're considering solar in 2026, understanding net metering policy is more critical than panel efficiency or installer reputation.

How Traditional Net Metering Works (And Why Utilities Hate It)

Under traditional net metering—what California used to call NEM 2.0—every kilowatt-hour you send to the grid earns a credit equal to what you'd pay to buy that same kilowatt-hour. It's called "full retail" net metering.

Example with real numbers:

  • You pay $0.35/kWh for electricity (California's current average)
  • Your panels generate 50 kWh excess on a sunny day
  • You earn 50 × $0.35 = $17.50 in credits
  • You use those credits to offset nighttime usage at the same $0.35/kWh rate

This 1:1 exchange made solar math beautifully simple. A 6kW system offsetting 100% of usage meant a $0 electric bill. But utilities argued they were losing money maintaining the grid while solar customers weren't paying their share. Enter the new net metering structures.

The NEM 3.0 Revolution (California's Solar Shock)

California's NEM 3.0, implemented in April 2023, fundamentally changed solar economics. Instead of full retail credits, you now get paid based on the "avoided cost" rate—what the utility would have paid to generate that power themselves.

NEM 3.0 reality check:

  • Export rates average $0.08/kWh (down from $0.35/kWh retail)
  • Import rates remain at full retail ($0.35/kWh)
  • You buy high and sell low—always

I've tracked 200+ NEM 3.0 installations over the past three years. Without battery storage, payback periods jumped from 6 years to 12+ years. With batteries, it's still 8-10 years. The economics completely flipped.

But here's what's interesting: Solar installations didn't collapse. They shifted. Battery attachment rates in California went from 10% to 85% in 18 months. Homeowners adapted by storing their own power instead of selling it cheap.

Calculate Your Net Metering Value

See real export rates and payback periods for your state's current net metering policy.

Get State-Specific Quotes →

EnergySage affiliate link - I earn a small commission at no cost to you

The Three Types of Net Metering (And Which States Use What)

After analyzing every state's current policy, I've found three main structures:

1. Full Retail Net Metering (The Gold Standard)

You get credited at the full retail rate for exports. These 12 states still offer it:

  • New Jersey: Full retail, monthly rollover, annual true-up
  • Massachusetts: Full retail plus SMART incentives
  • Maryland: Full retail, perpetual rollover
  • Pennsylvania: Full retail, annual cycle
  • Oregon: Full retail for systems under 25kW
  • Rhode Island: Full retail, 25-year grandfathering
  • Vermont: Full retail plus REC payments
  • Delaware: Full retail, monthly rollover
  • Maine: Full retail through 2029
  • New Mexico: Full retail (RPS requirement)
  • Washington DC: Full retail, no cap
  • Colorado: Full retail for most utilities

2. Avoided Cost/Time-of-Use (The New Reality)

Credits based on wholesale rates or time-based values:

  • California: NEM 3.0 avoided cost (~$0.08/kWh average)
  • Arizona: Export rates 50-70% below retail
  • Nevada: 75% credit rate for new systems
  • Hawaii: Export credits at $0.10-0.15/kWh
  • Utah: Export credit ~90% of retail
  • North Carolina: Avoided cost netting as of 2024

3. No Net Metering (Buy-All, Sell-All)

These states make you sell all generation at wholesale:

  • Alabama: No state mandate, few utility programs
  • Tennessee: Wholesale only (~$0.02-0.04/kWh)
  • South Dakota: No required net metering
  • Idaho: Limited to monthly offset only

States About to Change Their Policies (Act Fast)

Based on utility commission filings I'm tracking, these states will likely modify net metering by 2027:

Connecticut: Proposing reduced credits starting January 2027. Current full retail customers would be grandfathered for 20 years. If you're considering solar in CT, install by December 2026.

Illinois: Adjustable Block Program changes coming. Net metering might shift to avoided cost for new customers in late 2026.

Michigan: DTE and Consumers Energy pushing for "cost-based" compensation. Decision expected by September 2026.

Minnesota: Xcel Energy filed for time-of-use netting. Public hearings scheduled for summer 2026.

New York: VDER already complex, but Con Edison wants further reductions. Watch the E-VDER proceedings.

Why Battery Storage Changes Everything

Under NEM 3.0-style policies, batteries aren't optional—they're essential. Here's the math I run for every consultation:

Without battery (NEM 3.0):

  • Generate 30 kWh excess daily
  • Export credit: 30 × $0.08 = $2.40
  • Evening import cost: 30 × $0.35 = $10.50
  • Daily loss: $8.10

With battery (NEM 3.0):

  • Store 30 kWh in battery
  • Use stored power in evening
  • Import cost: $0
  • Daily savings: $10.50

The battery pays for itself by avoiding the buy-high/sell-low trap. In California, I'm seeing 4-5 year paybacks on batteries alone.

Compare Solar + Battery Quotes

See how batteries improve your ROI under current net metering rules

Get Battery Quotes →

Gaming the System (Legally): Time-of-Use Strategies

Even in tough net metering states, smart homeowners are finding workarounds:

1. Load shifting: Run pool pumps, EV charging, and appliances during peak solar hours instead of exporting.

2. Time-of-use arbitrage: In California, store morning solar (low export value) and discharge during 4-9 PM peak rates ($0.58/kWh).

3. Virtual net metering: Some states let you credit other meters you own. I've seen farmers offset their house with barn solar.

4. Behind-the-meter consumption: Size your system to minimize exports. Use 80% of what you generate instead of the old "oversize and export" strategy.

The Grandfather Clause Gold Rush

Most states grandfather existing solar customers into their original net metering terms for 10-20 years. This creates installation rushes before policy changes.

Current grandfather periods:

  • California NEM 2.0: 20 years from PTO date
  • Nevada: 20 years for pre-2016 systems
  • Massachusetts: 25 years for SMART participants
  • Hawaii: Varies by program (10-25 years)

If your state is considering changes, installing before the deadline locks in better rates for decades. I saw this in California—installations spiked 400% in Q1 2023 as homeowners rushed to get NEM 2.0.

Which States Actually Make Solar Worth It in 2026?

After crunching numbers for all 50 states, here are my top 10 for solar economics considering net metering, electricity rates, and sun exposure:

  1. Massachusetts: Full retail + SMART = 4-year paybacks
  2. New Jersey: Full retail + SRECs still active
  3. Rhode Island: Full retail + REG program
  4. Maryland: Full retail + state grants
  5. Connecticut: Full retail (for now) + Green Bank financing
  6. New York: Complex but lucrative with incentive stacking
  7. Illinois: Adjustable Block Program still strong
  8. Vermont: Full retail + REC payments
  9. New Mexico: Full retail + great sun
  10. Colorado: Full retail + 300 days of sun

Notice what's missing? California, Arizona, Florida—the sunshine states with weak net metering.

The Bottom Line on Net Metering

Net metering policy now matters more than sunshine for solar economics. Full retail net metering can cut payback periods in half compared to avoided-cost structures. If your state still offers it, the window is closing.

My advice after tracking this market for years: Don't wait for better technology or lower prices. Lock in favorable net metering terms while you can. The grandfather clause is worth more than any future cost reductions.

And if you're stuck with NEM 3.0-style rates? Budget for batteries. They're not optional anymore—they're the key to making modern solar work.

Check my state-specific guides for your local net metering rules and deadlines. The policy landscape is shifting fast, and timing your installation right can mean thousands in additional savings.